EU Financial Regulation Intelligence.
Powered by AI. Grounded in Law.

Query 6,695+ regulatory provisions across MiCAR, MiFID II, AIFMD, DORA, and 130+ sources.
Get structured legal analysis in minutes — not weeks.

Covering EU · Netherlands · Luxembourg · Germany  |  133+ regulatory sources  |  Updated daily from 28 monitoring feeds

The €50,000 Question

A single legal opinion on MiFID II classification costs €50,000–€100,000 and takes 4–8 weeks. A DORA compliance assessment from a Big 4 firm runs €200,000+. Most fund managers, wealth managers, and compliance teams can’t afford to ask the question — let alone get the answer.

financialregulations.eu changes that equation.

How We Compare

The same regulatory question, four different approaches.

 Law FirmBig 4 ConsultantGeneric AI (ChatGPT)Argus
MiFID II classification opinion€50K–€100K€80K–€150KUnreliable€599/mo
DORA compliance assessment€100K–€200K€200K–€400KUnreliable€599/mo
AIFMD fund document review€30K–€60K€50K–€100KUnreliable€599/mo
Turnaround time4–8 weeks6–12 weeksMinutes90 seconds
Capabilities
Cites specific articles & recitals
Covers 6,695+ provisions
Updated daily from 28 feeds
Structured deliverable output
Available 24/7
No hallucination risk

Prices based on published rate cards from Magic Circle law firms and Big 4 advisory practices (2024–2025). Argus is a regulatory research tool, not a replacement for legal counsel. All outputs must be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before reliance.

Built For Professionals Who Need Answers

Whether you manage funds, advise clients, or ensure compliance — Argus gives you structured regulatory analysis grounded in primary sources.

Fund Managers & AIFMs

Navigate AIFMD II, SFDR, and cross-border distribution. Review prospectuses, PPMs, and fund documentation against regulatory requirements.

"Does my Luxembourg RAIF need to appoint a liquidity management tool under AIFMD II?"

In-House Legal Counsel

Get first-draft regulatory analysis in minutes instead of weeks. Use structured outputs as briefing documents for external counsel review.

"What are the Article 16 AIFMD delegation requirements for a third-country sub-adviser?"

Compliance Officers

Monitor regulatory change across 28 feeds. Run gap analyses against DORA, MiCAR, and MiFID II obligations.

"Which DORA RTS requirements apply to our ICT third-party contracts?"

Wealth & Asset Managers

Understand MiFID II suitability obligations, product governance rules, and cross-selling restrictions for your client portfolios.

"What are the MiFID II product governance requirements for distributing a structured product?"

Consultants & Advisors

Deliver faster, better-sourced regulatory analysis to your clients. Use Argus as a force multiplier for your advisory practice.

"Compare SFDR Article 8 and Article 9 disclosure requirements for a real estate fund."

Crypto & Digital Asset Firms

Navigate the MiCAR/MiFID II boundary. Determine token classification, CASP licensing requirements, and white paper obligations.

"Is a governance token with fee-sharing a financial instrument under MiFID II?"

Three Ways to Use Argus

Query regulations, review documents, or monitor changes — all grounded in primary legal sources.

Regulatory Q&A

Ask any question about EU financial regulation. Get cited, structured answers grounded in primary legislation, implementing measures, and supervisory guidance.

“Does a tokenized RAIF require CSSF approval under the Blockchain IV Law?”

→ Structured answer with article citations in 30 seconds.

Document Review

Upload a prospectus, fund document, compliance policy, or advisory report. Select your deliverable type. Receive a structured legal analysis with statement-by-statement assessment, risk ratings, and gap identification.

Supports: PDF, DOCX, Markdown, HTML

Regulatory Monitoring

28 regulatory sources monitored daily across EU, NL, DE, and LU. EUR-Lex Official Journal, ESMA, EBA, ECB, AFM, DNB, BaFin, CSSF, and more. Get alerted when regulation changes that affects your business.

Coming soon: automated impact assessment for your specific regulatory profile.

Document Review in Action

Upload a document, configure your analysis, and receive a structured regulatory review with article-level citations.

1

Upload Document

Upload your prospectus, fund document, compliance policy, or advisory report.

PDF · 2.4 MB

fund_prospectus_raif_2026.pdf

2

Configure Analysis

Select jurisdiction, deliverable type, and guiding prompt.

Guiding prompt

Regulatory compliance review against AIFMD II, SFDR Art. 8, and Luxembourg RAIF requirements

3

Argus Analyses

Hybrid retrieval across 6,695+ provisions. Claude generates structured analysis with citations.

Processing

47 provisions retrieved · 12 regulations matched · 3 jurisdictions

4

Structured Deliverable

Receive a comprehensive analysis with article-level citations, risk ratings, and recommendations.

Output

Export as Markdown, PDF, or DOCX

AIFMD II Compliance Review — RAIF ProspectusGenerated in 47s

Liquidity Management Tools (Art. 16 AIFMD II)

Gap Identified

Prospectus does not specify at least one LMT from the ESMA list. AIFMD II Art. 16(2)(a) requires AIFMs of open-ended AIFs to select at least one LMT. Recommendation: add anti-dilution levy or swing pricing mechanism.

Delegation Arrangements (Art. 20 AIFMD II)

Compliant

Delegation to sub-adviser is properly documented with substance requirements. The AIFM retains portfolio management oversight and risk management functions as required by Art. 20(1).

SFDR Art. 8 Disclosures

Partial

Pre-contractual disclosures under Annex II of Delegated Reg. (EU) 2022/1288 are present but missing the PAI indicators table required by Art. 7 SFDR RTS. Minimum 14 mandatory indicators must be disclosed.

3 sections · 47 provisions cited · 12 regulations referencedDownload as PDF, DOCX, or Markdown

From Question to Answer in 90 Seconds

A simple four-step workflow from regulatory question to actionable deliverable.

1

Ask or Upload

Type a regulatory question or upload a document for review. Select jurisdiction filters and deliverable type.

2

Argus Retrieves

Our knowledge base searches 6,695+ regulatory provisions using hybrid dense+sparse retrieval with graph expansion. Every answer is grounded in specific articles, recitals, and guidance documents.

3

Analysis Generated

Claude analyses the retrieved regulatory context against your question or document. The output is a structured deliverable with article-level citations, risk classifications, and actionable recommendations.

4

Download & Use

Export as Markdown, PDF, or DOCX. Use it as a first draft, a compliance checklist, or a briefing document for your legal team.

What’s in the Knowledge Base

A purpose-built regulatory knowledge base — not general training data. Every provision is structured, cited, and kept current.

6,695+

Regulatory Provisions

Curated regulatory chunks from primary legislation, implementing measures, supervisory guidance, and market practice standards.

4

Jurisdictions

EU-level regulation plus Netherlands, Germany, and Luxembourg — the three key fund domiciles and financial centres.

28

Monitoring Feeds

EUR-Lex, ESMA, EBA, ECB, EIOPA, AFM, DNB, BaFin, CSSF, and more — checked daily for regulatory change.

133+

Regulatory Sources

From MiCAR and MiFID II to AIFMD, DORA, SFDR, EMIR, and national implementation measures.

Regulations Covered

MiCAR

890+ provisions

MiFID II / MiFIR

1,200+ provisions

AIFMD / AIFMD II

680+ provisions

DORA + RTS

520+ provisions

SFDR + Taxonomy

340+ provisions

UCITS

290+ provisions

EMIR

310+ provisions

Prospectus Reg.

220+ provisions

MAR

280+ provisions

CRR / CRD

450+ provisions

AML Directives

380+ provisions

National (NL/DE/LU)

1,135+ provisions

Inside a Knowledge Base Entry

Every provision is stored with rich metadata — not raw text. Legal structure, temporal applicability, and cross-references are preserved.

eu-micar-art-3-1-5In force
MiCARPrimary Legislation (L1)

Definition of 'crypto-asset'

Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, Article 3(1)(5)

"'crypto-asset' means a digital representation of a value or a right which may be transferred and stored electronically, using distributed ledger technology or similar technology"

Cross-References

  • MiFID II Art. 4(1)(15) — Financial instruments definition
  • MiCAR Art. 2(4) — Scope exclusion for financial instruments
  • ESMA Guidelines ESMA75-453128700-1323 — Qualification criteria

Supervisory Guidance

  • ESMA Q&A on MiCAR, Section 2.1
  • AFM Guidance on crypto-asset classification (2024)

Metadata

JurisdictionEU
Applicable from2024-06-30
Chunk typearticle-definition
EmbeddingBGE-M3
Confidence100%
Related recitalsRecital 2, Recital 12, Recital 14
Ingested12/03/2026
SourceEUR-Lex (Official Journal)

Simple, Transparent Pricing

Start free. Upgrade when you need more queries, document reviews, or API access.

MonthlyAnnual

Explorer

Free
  • 2 queries / month
  • 0 document reviews
  • Q&A only
  • Markdown export only
  • EU jurisdiction only
  • No API access
  • Community support
Most Popular

Professional

€599/month
  • 50 queries / month
  • 10 document reviews / month
  • All analysis types
  • All export formats
  • All jurisdictions
  • No API access
  • Email support (48h)

Enterprise

€1,299/month
  • Unlimited queries
  • Unlimited document reviews
  • All analysis types
  • All export formats
  • All jurisdictions
  • API access
  • Real-time alerts
  • Priority support (4h)

Built on Real Regulation, Not Training Data

Most AI legal tools rely on general training data that may be outdated, incomplete, or hallucinated. Argus is different: every response is grounded in a curated knowledge base of 6,695+ regulatory provisions, built and maintained by financial regulation specialists.

Every answer cites specific articles, recitals, and regulatory provisions
Knowledge base built from official EU legislative texts and regulatory publications
Sources updated daily from 28 monitoring feeds across EU, Dutch, Luxembourg, and German regulators
Document review checks against the full regulatory knowledge base, not just keyword matching
All outputs include confidence indicators and flag areas of regulatory uncertainty
Built by financial regulation practitioners, not just engineers

Important Disclaimer

financialregulations.eu is a regulatory intelligence tool, not a law firm. All outputs are generated by artificial intelligence and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice, regulatory guidance, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. While we strive for accuracy and keep our knowledge base up to date, AI-generated analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of complex regulatory provisions. Always verify critical findings with a qualified legal professional before making regulatory, compliance, or business decisions. By using this service, you acknowledge that financialregulations.eu and its operators bear no liability for decisions made based on AI-generated outputs.